Archive for the ‘Afghanistan’ Category
January 26, 2013
Whenever a new government or new party is elected, particularly in the Third World, a promise to eradicate corruption is always at the forefront. But why do these promises almost never materialize?
The answer is more simple than it appears. Government doesn’t lead society; it REFLECTS society. If people in government are corrupt, it is because this corruption, this way of thinking and getting things done, is pervasive throughout the society.
So, at best, new parties and new governments make a big show of “attacking corruption” by arresting a few people. What they are really doing, however, is just trying to scare everyone from pushing the boundaries of corruption, so that they don’t “get caught.” All the while, even the new government officials continue with corrupt practices in their daily lives. The people change, over and over, but the corrupt system never changes.
Why is this?
The problem starts with young children. I see this every day as a teacher.
Young, impressionable children watch and notice the way their parents deal with the issues of life each day. In most third-world countries, when the child has a severe problem at school, instead of letting the child repeat the grade, the parents go in and “beg” or pay a bribe for their child to be promoted (because parents feel ashamed if their child is not promoted). When the child gets a bad grade or doesn’t do homework, parents do the same thing. Instead of children being taught that they will have the consequences of their actions, good or bad, they are taught that one can “get out of any consequence” by either paying a bribe, or knowing the right people. Is it any wonder that they grow up into corrupt adults?
Corruption will never be eliminated in government until it is first eliminated in society. Yet, speaking as a teacher, I don’t see this happening at all. Even five-year-olds are learning this corrupt behavior by watching their own parents.
I personally know of one case where a five-year-old told his teacher that if the teacher didn’t allow him to do as he pleased, “I will bring my father in and have you fired!” (The result was that the foreign teacher told him, “Go right ahead! Go get your father right now! I’m waiting for him!” The student didn’t know quite what to say after that, as he wasn’t expecting that response…..)
So where, exactly, does the endemic corruption in third-world nations come from? It comes from the class system. In order to have a meritocracy, and fair treatment for all, whether in the courts or in daily life, EVERYONE HAS TO BE EQUAL UNDER THE LAW. In third-world countries, and even in many developed countries, this is unfortunately not the case. Those who are born wealthy, or with titles, the right name, or connections can get away with crimes of any sort and no court will convict them. This is truly what it means being “above the law.”
The ONLY way, therefore, for ordinary citizens to get justice, or even things done in everyday life, is through “knowing the right person (powerful people),” or paying a bribe. In every class of society, those above exploit those below. (This does not mean every individual in the society exploits others, but it is true as a general rule.) The rich exploit the middle and lower working classes. Even lower-middle class people, if they have some economic success in their own lives, hire a maid and exploit her even worse than higher classes. People on the lower end steal and cheat time-wise on their employers because they feel like they “deserve it.” They feel this way because it is a passive-aggressive sort of class warfare.
The same dynamic plays out in companies where many bosses exploit their workers. Since there is no justice in third-world countries, it is dangerous to resist directly, so they resist in a passive-aggressive manner, “forgetting” important things, showing up late, etc. Their jobs are often protected by “work rules” which mean they can’t be fired for any of these sorts of infractions.
Not every boss is exploitative. Unfortunately, when a foreign manager is working with these sorts of employees, their behavior is very confusing. The manger expects a certain level of output, what is normal for himself, or in his own home country. He gets only 1/3 of that and wonders what is wrong. He tries every tactic to improve productivity, only to find workers getting worse and worse. (He can’t fire them due to work rules.) What’s wrong is those particular workers have the class-warfare mentality.
In third-world countries, because of the “class” system, no one will ever be equal under the law. Even in countries with recent revolutions, such as in Arab Spring countries, the class system and class-warfare mentalities continue. So I am not optimistic that they will be able to develop meritocracies.
Democracy (or democratic reform) means nothing without meritocracy.
–Lynne Diligent
Tags:bosses exploiting workers, class warfare, corrupt practices are common in daily lives, corrupt systems, corruption as a way to "get things done" in class-bases societies, corruption starts with young children viewing their parents behavior, democracy and democratic reform means nothing without meritocracy, employees in a business change but the endemic problems stay the same, everyone has to be equal under the law, governments are corrupt because their whole societies are corrupt, governments reflect their societies, how can ordinary citizens get justice in a corrupt country, how to get things done in third-world societies, in countries with the class system no one will ever be equal under the law, knowing the right people, new governments get elected but nothing changes, paying bribes to government officials and policemen, upper classes exploiting lower classes, what it means to be "above the law", where does endemic corruption come from in Africa and other third-world societies, why are people in government corrupt, why do promises to eradicate corruption never materialize, why maids feel entitled to steal from their employers, why the Arab Spring revolutions will change nothing in North African countries
Posted in Afghanistan, Africa, African Culture, Algeria, American Culture, Anglo-Saxon Countries, Arab World, Argentina, Asia, Australia, Belize, Berbers, Brazil, Britain, Bullying, Burkina-Faso, Burundi, Business, Cameroon, Canada, Cayman Islands, Central African Republic, Children, Chile, China, Colorado, Columbia, Congo, Corruption, Costa Rica, Cuba, Cultural Misunderstandings, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Economics, Education, Egypt, Elementary Education, England, Ethiopia, Europe, Expat, Explaining Middle Eastern Culture to Americans, Explaining North African Culture to Americans, France, Francophone Countries, French Culture, Germany, Global HR, Globalization, Greece, Guatemala, Holland, Honduras, Immigration, In-Group Cultures, India, Indonesia, Intercultural, International, International Business, International HR, International Jobs, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Living Abroad, Maids, Malaysia, Mali, Mauritania, Mexico, Middle East, Middle Eastern Culture, Multicultural, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, North Africa, North African Culture, Norway, Pakistan, Palestine, Panama, Parenting, Peru, Portugal, Roatan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Scotland, Senegal, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Sweden, Syria, Tanzania, Teaching Abroad, Travel, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Venezuela, Wales, World Economic Conditions, Yemen, Zaire | 10 Comments »
January 12, 2013
As a foreigner, I’m tempted to feel like the problems I’ve had with maids just don’t happen to locals. However, as this series, “Maids from House-to-House,” (in Arabic) illustrates, locals do seem to have just as many problems with their maids as foreigners do.
At the moment, I’m lucky to have a good maid. The other day my maid told me that about 80 percent of people she had worked for were bad; I replied that 80 percent of the maids I’d had were not good, either.
It’s difficult having someone in your house to cook or clean. Aside from obvious risks such as stealing, you really bring a person with all of their personal problems into your home. When one recent maid we had did not do the work correctly and I asked her to do many things again, she told us that the reason she went to work was to get away from her mother who was always telling her that she wasn’t doing things properly. She complained that she expected us not to do the same thing! We worked with her quite a while, with little improvement, and finally had to let her go.
One of the biggest problems is in trying to train someone to do tasks in the way you want, and not the way they may be used to. Some maids cannot understand what is wrong with using a hand to flip water from a bucket all over the room (getting the legs of your expensive wooden furniture wet). Others cannot understand why you don’t want your expensive wooden furniture wiped down with a wet rag (completely destroys the finish). Others apparently wash the dishes as if they were wearing a blindfold, either don’t get them clean, or chip all your cups and plates because they are not careful, or don’t follow the procedures that you demonstrate and request. Most waste cleaning materials such as cleanser, soap, or steel wool pads; most destroy equipment such as brooms–after all they are not paying for it. Others lie all the time about work they claim to have done, but didn’t. Others never wash their hands before working in the kitchen (except while you are watching).
Some maids do not keep themselves clean and even smell bad. When I told my North African sister-in-law that we want someone with personal hygiene, she told me that many women actually want to employ maids who are dirty and smelly, in order to keep their husbands from chasing after them!
Apparently there are quite a few maids who attempt to “steal away” the wife’s husband, sometimes by using witchcraft. Many say, “An attractive maid could steal your husband.” Some maids are believed to practice witchcraft. One foreign friend’s Moroccan in-laws visited her home while she was traveling outside of the country, and found that her maid had put some kind of witchcraft object in the kitchen cupboard specifically designed to steal away her Moroccan husband. The in-laws fired the maid immediately.
Most maids have to be constantly supervised, either to make sure they are following the procedures you requested, and not doing as they please the minute you turn your back, or because they want to do as little work as possible. Finding someone who can look around and see what needs to be done, learn to do it the way you want it done, and who can do it without being supervised is a rare find.
On the humorous Arabic TV series about maids, some maids who try to help but who make terrible decisions on their own. Most maids gossip with other maids about their employers. Some maids are even crazy (and sometimes employers who are crazy).
So why have a maid? Life here is not organized to be able to work and take care of children on your own. It is assumed that people either have maids or plenty of unemployed family members who can do necessary tasks such as picking up children for lunch and taking them back to school, cooking the maid meal for the family at midday, or running errands to places that are only open normal working hours, such as paying a telephone or electric bill. A maid is supposed to buy you some time, but often it buys as much headache as anything else. If you are lucky enough to find a good maid, you want to hang on to her.
Maids, for Middle-Easterners, are also a status symbol. Many families who grow up not being able to afford a maid get one the very minute they reach the lower-middle class (especially in the cities). It’s a way to announce that you have reached the middle class. In addition, the life of a middle-class working woman is not easy. Generally, many women do all the raising of the children and keeping of the house, IN ADDITION to working full-time, while their husband spends his time at his job, but has plenty of leisure time at the cafe or with friends. Middle-class working women have very little, or no, leisure time, and it’s a way for them to get some time to themselves, or to spend with their children.
Upper-class women generally have two or three maids, a chauffeur, a gardener, and a guardian. It is the lifestyle everyone respects and aspires to.
–Lynne Diligent
Tags:child maids, is having a maid decadent, maids who practice witchcraft, maids who try to steal husbands, Men dar Eldar TV program about maids in Morocco, Moroccan maids, risks in having a maid, why do people need or want a maid
Posted in Afghanistan, Africa, African Culture, Algeria, Arab World, Argentina, Asia, Australia, Belize, Berbers, Brazil, Britain, Burkina-Faso, Burundi, Business, Cameroon, Canada, Cayman Islands, Central African Republic, Chile, China, Columbia, Congo, Costa Rica, Cuba, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Economics, Ecuador, Education, Egypt, England, Ethiopia, Europe, Expat, Explaining Middle Eastern Culture to Americans, Explaining North African Culture to Americans, France, French Culture, Germany, Global HR, Globalization, Greece, Guatemala, Holland, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Intercultural, International, International Business, International HR, International Jobs, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Lifestyle, Living Abroad, Maids, maids who gossip about their employers, Malaysia, Mali, Mauritania, Mexico, Middle East, Middle Eastern Culture, Multicultural, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, North African Culture, Norway, Pakistan, Palestine, Panama, Peru, Portugal, Roatan, Russia, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Scotland, Senegal, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Sweden, Syria, Tanzania, Teaching Abroad, Teaching ESL, Travel, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Venezuela, Wales, why middle-class women in third-world countries need a maid, Women, World Economic Conditions, Yemen, Zaire | 5 Comments »
December 5, 2012
“Kitchen! Kitchen!” Most North African boys still make fun of each other by saying this, which means, “Sissy!” (For my foreign readers, this means, “You’re acting like a girl!”)
North African mothers still raise their daughters to do all the housework, and boys are not expected to help at all. (The only exception is in some families where there are no girls, and the boys have learned to help.)
The first generation of educated, North African women are out in the labor force. But are the attitudes of men changing? Not yet. Working women are still expected to work full time AND do ALL of the child care AND take care of ALL the housework. In general, men are expected to work, and spend all of the rest of their time relaxing. They still expect to come home and find “everything done and waiting for them.” (A very few modern husbands do help out doing dishes or cooking, or with general housework. But they don’t tell their friends! Some even make sure the curtains are closed so no neighbors see them helping out, either.)
As one young dual-citizen North African-American girl told me, “In North American culture, MEN take care of WOMEN. In Arab culture, WOMEN are expected to take care of MEN.” This accounts for the shocking experience of American women who marry Arab men, only to find they are expected to take care of the man as if they were his MOTHER! Many intercultural couples have hit the divorce courts over this exact issue, as many of these men are unable to adapt, even when living in America.
Will this change, in Arab countries, within a generation, as the second generation of women hits the workforce in 25 years? I don’t think so. Here’s why not. This is my own theory, but when I discussed it with several local North African women, they all agreed with me.
Islamic inheritance laws give double to boys as they do to girls. The reason for this is that men are supposed to be financially responsible for women under their care, in THEORY. If a man is decent, he will do it. (But just as everywhere, many men are irresponsible, or not decent.) In practice, many women are never able to claim their inheritance rights, particularly in places like mountain villages. (Crawford, 2008)
The essential point is this. Every woman knows that she is under a man’s thumb, or will be in the future. Girls are under their father’s control. Wives are still under their husband’s control in most Arab countries (such as needing the husband’s permission to get or renew a passport, even for a foreign wife, such as in Egypt). When women become widows, they are not free, but instead under the control of their sons, and at the mercy of their sons! Love aside, THIS is the TRUE reason why mothers spoil their sons so extremely. That son is eventually going to have power over them, and be responsible for supporting them in old age, so of course they need that to be a very strong emotional relationship. But it accounts for why they young boys are treated as pashas (the amount varying by specific country, but in all countries when in comparison with the West, where boys and girls are treated equally).
When I asked several North African women, that what if inheritance (and divorce) laws were changed and made totally equal between men and women, do they think women would continue to treat men and boys as pashas? Each of the women I asked answered me by saying, “What you say is true, of course they would not.”
However, since those inheritance laws are laid out in the Koran, I don’t see any changes on the horizon!
–Lynne Diligent
Tags:Arab husbands, Arab women who have trouble claiming their inheritance rights, are North African and Arab husbands helping with childcare dishes or housework, are North African boys expected to help out with household chores yet, divorce laws in Arab countries, do real men do laundry dishes childcare cooking cleaning, how many Arab husbands help out with the housework, if husbands want more romance they have to help out in the kitchen and the home, Islamic inheritance laws, Islamic inheritance laws and how they affect women, Muslim husbands, North African husbands, progress in relationships between men and women in North Africa, the problems with inheritance laws in Arab countries, why are Arab and North African boys spoiled while girls have to work hard, why are sons preferred to daughters in Arab culture, women's liberation in Arab countries, women's rights in North African and Islamic countries
Posted in Afghanistan, Africa, African Culture, Algeria, American Culture, American Life, Anglo-Saxon Countries, Arab Spring, Arab World, Argentina, Asia, Australia, Belize, Berbers, Brazil, Bullying, Burkina-Faso, Burundi, Business, Cameroon, Canada, Central African Republic, Children, Chile, China, Colorado, Columbia, Congo, Corruption, Costa Rica, Cuba, Cultural Misunderstandings, Dating, Dating Advice, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Economics, Ecuador, Education, Egypt, Elementary Education, England, ESL, Ethiopia, Europe, Expat, Explaining Middle Eastern Culture to Americans, Explaining North African Culture to Americans, France, Francofile Countries, Francophone Countries, Frankophone Countries, French Culture, Germany, Global HR, Globalization, Greece, Guatemala, Holland, Honduras, Immigration, In-Group Cultures, India, Indonesia, Intercultural, International, International Business, International HR, International Jobs, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Ivory Coast, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Learning English, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Lifestyle, Living Abroad, Malaysia, Mali, Mauritania, Men, Mexico, Middle East, Middle Eastern Culture, Multicultural, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, North Africa, North African Culture, Norway, Pakistan, Palestine, Panama, Parenting, Peru, Portugal, Relationships, Russia, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Scotland, Senegal, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Sweden, Syria, Tanzania, Teaching, Teaching Abroad, Teaching ESL, Travel, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Venezuela, Wales, War on Terror, Women, World Economic Conditions, Yemen, Zaire | 5 Comments »
November 12, 2012
I live in North Africa. Sometimes foreigners and expats assume that only they are getting taken advantage of by taxi drivers. It’s always reassuring when we find out that the locals get ripped-off, too. (Misery loves company!)
My local-country citizen, North African friend, who lives in another part of our country, recently arrived in my city by train. He asked me, “How much does it cost to get a taxi from the new train station to the main square?”
I told him he had to be careful of the taxis which park right next to the train station, as they wait there to charge rip-off fares to everyone. I told him if he could walk about two blocks, he could find taxis at the normal fare. Unfortunately, he had too much luggage to do that.
Being a local North African citizen in his own country, he was able to get a taxi at only double the normal fare, although the taxis do get away with charging five times the normal fare to foreigners. Instead of driving around looking for fares, those taxis find it easier to sit in a line all day, and just make up for the lack of fares by charging only one very expensive fare! It’s a bit like prostitutes who are unwilling to work for normal wages at a normal job, and charge a high price for a few hours of work.
My friend replied, “Taxi whores! hahaha”
So I’m afraid I can’t take credit for this clever name…..
–Lynne Diligent
N.B — There are many honest taxi drivers; it’s just sometimes hard to find them when you need them!
Tags:dishonest taxi drivers, taxi problems, why do taxi drivers in every city drive you around the long way, why taxis ask where you are from is to find out if you are from out of town and don't know the routes if they drive you around the long way
Posted in Afghanistan, Africa, African Culture, Algeria, Arab World, Argentina, Asia, Australia, Belize, Berbers, Brazil, Britain, Burkina-Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Canada, Cats, Cayman Islands, Central African Republic, Chile, China, Columbia, Congo, Corruption, Costa Rica, Cuba, Cultural Misunderstandings, Economics, Ecuador, Egypt, England, Ethiopia, Europe, Expat, France, Francofile Countries, Francophone Countries, French Culture, Germany, Global HR, Globalization, Greece, Guatemala, Holland, Honduras, Humor, In-Group Cultures, India, Indonesia, Intercultural, International, International Business, International HR, International Jobs, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Japan, Japanese Culture, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Lifestyle, Living Abroad, Malaysia, Mali, Mauritania, Mexico, Middle East, Multicultural, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, North Africa, North African Culture, Norway, Pakistan, Palestine, Panama, Parenting, Peru, Portugal, Roatan, Russia, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Scotland, Senegal, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Sweden, Syria, Tanzania, Teaching Abroad, Travel, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Uncategorized, Venezuela, Wales, Women, World Economic Conditions, Yemen, Zaire | 7 Comments »
October 19, 2012
“Those Peace Corps workers are spies in our country!”
As an American living in the Middle East for twenty years, I am amazed each time I hear this. Whenever I ask, “Why would you think that?” I never receive a clear, satisfactory, or understandable answer–but now, I finally have.
A North African friend explained to me that the saying, “Know your enemy!” is extremely popular throughout Arab culture in the Middle East. He said that most ordinary citizens in the street view the American government as an enemy, (regardless of whether their own governments are allies with the United States). This is both because of America’s seeming “unconditional” support for Israel, and because the United States has been involved in wars in the Middle East, or in seeming support of previous dictators in the region.
Therefore, when Peace Corps volunteers come to the Middle East, people wonder, “Why would anyone leave their own rich countries, in order to come and live in a very poor lifestyle, among us, saying they want to help us?”
Many Middle Easterners, especially those who are poor and living in rural areas, just don’t understand the idea of volunteer work. (1) (They are judging foreigners by their own standards, since they would not go to help others who were not part of their own family/religious group, or from whom they did not “want” something in return–such as information, or a natural resource.) They just don’t trust anyone; in general, Middle Eastern societies are low in trust of others. Their recent experience of colonialism increases their distrust.
When I point out, “What possible interest would the American government have in the life of your little mountain village?” I usually get vague and confusing answers that make no sense to me (being a Westerner). But now I have received an understandable answer. My local friend told me, ” They think America is studying every aspect of how they live and think in order to better know their enemy.”
What a sad case of two ships passing in the night, in terms of cultural misunderstanding!
Just to set the record straight, Peace Corps workers are NOT spies, never have been, and never will be. While they have apparently been ASKED on a couple of occasions (Bolivia and Cuba), read the link to see that they refused, and that this is NOT government policy. However, when I pointed this out to my friend, she asked me, “OK, these volunteers refused to spy, but how on earth would we be sure EVERY Peace Corps volunteer would refuse to spy?” At least now, I understand where they are coming from.
–Lynne Diligent
(1) 06-EuroMedJeunesse-Etude_MOROCCO.pdf (p. 7, 8, 17, 23)
Tags:Middle Eastern culture is a very low-trust culture, Middle Eastern dark glasses, Middle Easterners are always thinking about "know your enemy", Peace Corps workers are NOT spies, Peace Corps workers' problems, poor rural peasants in North Africa and the Middle East distrust volunteers from rich countries, recent experiences of colonialism increase distrust of other countries' humanitarian efforts in the Third World, Why do people think Peace Corps workers are spies, why volunteers are distrusted in third world countries
Posted in Afghanistan, Africa, African Culture, Algeria, American Culture, American Life, Anglo-Saxon Countries, Arab Spring, Arab World, Argentina, Asia, Australia, Belize, Berbers, Brazil, Britain, Burkina-Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Canada, Central African Republic, Chile, China, Columbia, Congo, Corruption, Costa Rica, Cuba, Cultural Misunderstandings, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Economics, Ecuador, Education, Egypt, England, ESL, Ethiopia, Europe, Expat, Explaining American Culture to Foreigners, Explaining Middle Eastern Culture to Americans, Explaining North African Culture to Americans, France, Francofile Countries, Francophone Countries, Frankophone Countries, French Culture, Germany, Global HR, Globalization, Greece, Guatemala, Holland, Honduras, Immigration, In-Group Cultures, India, Indonesia, Intercultural, International, International Business, International HR, International Jobs, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Learning English, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Lifestyle, Living Abroad, Malaysia, Mali, Mauritania, Mexico, Middle East, Middle Eastern Culture, Multicultural, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, North Africa, North African Culture, Norway, Pakistan, Palestine, Panama, Peru, Portugal, Relationships, Roatan, Russia, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Scotland, Senegal, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Sweden, Syria, Tanzania, Teaching, Teaching Abroad, Teaching ESL, Travel, Tunisia, Turkey, Uncategorized, Venezuela, Wales, War on Terror, World Economic Conditions, Yemen, Zaire | 2 Comments »
July 26, 2012
Are disturbing thoughts disrupting your meditation?
Does this sound like you?
“I’ve tried meditation but it never worked for me. Why? Because whenever I sit and relax and close my eyes, I get too conscious. That is, I start thinking that I’m trying it because “I’M NOT OK,” and that I’m sick to the point that medicine and western science is not capable of healing me. A lot of these negative thoughts invade my mind and scare the hell out of me! So, instead of feeling relieved, poorly-practised meditation makes my situation worse and worse!! Can you help? If there is anyone in the world who needs this, it’s me.” –from a reader friend (who is a competent professional in his field)
This post is to give some quick, practical help to anyone who has tried meditation in the past, and who has not been successful at it, yet wants to try again. After trying meditation unsuccessfully, on and off, for 30 years, I had a sudden breakthrough. I want to help my readers have this same, quick breakthrough success. If you are short of time, skip to the bottom of this post, where I explain what worked for me.
Meditation, and Techniques of Meditation, are TOOLS
The thing to understand about meditation is that it is not an end, in and of itself. Meditation, and the techniques of meditation, are TOOLS designed to help one achieve a certain state-of-mind, which can later be induced at will. Meditation practice is practice USING THE TOOL. This is the essential point which is often not explained in many books; this is why many people feel like they are wasting their time attempting meditation, because they are told to do it, without being told what they are doing it FOR.
Here is an analogy. Suppose you live in an area far from civilization and a storm destroys your house. You need to rebuild. Suppose someone hands you a hammer, and you have never before used a hammer. When you pick it up and try to learn how to use it under conditions of extreme duress, it is difficult to be successful. A hammer is much easier to use under duress if one has already learned how to use it, and practiced with it many times before. So, too, with meditation. Through short daily practice, one learns to USE the tool, so that when situations of duress arrive, one can pick up the tool and use it effectively.
One type of meditation is like a hammer, another type is like a screwdriver, and another type is like a set of pliers.
Three Essentials
1.) Many styles and types of meditation work if you know what you are aiming for (turning off the left brain). These styles can include sitting and chanting, sitting and watching one’s breath, walking meditation (done in a certain style), Tai Chi (moving meditation), among others.
I recommend starting with sitting meditation, watching one’s breath, until you have success (discussed below), before moving to one of the other styles. Moving meditation is more difficult to start with to achieve the right state, but once you have achieved it, and know what you are looking for, then it is possible to achieve it with the moving meditation styles also.
2.) Don’t get confused by rules; they are flexible.
—Do you have to sit in a lotus position? NO. Can you sit in a chair? YES
—For those unable to sit up, can you lie down? YES. (but it is more difficult to do it without falling asleep)
—For those who cannot sit still at all, are there types of moving meditation? YES. (Actually, even monks recommend periods of moving meditation to be interspersed with periods of sitting meditation.)
—Is it necessary to chant a mantra? NO. If using a mantra, is it necessary to use a Sanskrit-word mantra? NO.
3.) Just like learning a foreign language, the beginning is the most difficult; the easiest way to overcome this hurdle is to reduce practice time to only one-to-two minutes (once or twice a day), in the beginning. This will keep you from becoming overly frustrated.
What Did NOT Work for Me, and Why
1.) Attempting a lotus position. Some of us have far less flexibility than others, and the way we are raised in the West often does not promote the same kind of flexibility that other lifestyles promote starting in childhood. Yoga practitioners or others can sometimes develop more flexibility as adults.
2.) Sitting still and chanting a mantra. The mantra is often given by a teacher, which I did not have. Books suggested different mantras such as “om,” or “Om mane padme hume,” (which means “the jewel of the lotus flower”). So, I did not really find it useful to attempt saying the Sanskrit words, even knowing the English meaning. I spent more time wondering about what those English words meant. What IS the jewel of the lotus flower?
Indian meditation masters also suggest in their books for Westerners that one can use the name of God (in any language or religion) as a mantra to chant. They say the most common question, is how does chanting the name of God over and over help anyone? They respond by asking us to look at the question in the negative. Suppose you heard that someone was taking the name of the devil and chanting it over and over. Nearly everyone agrees that would be harmful. Therefore, chanting the name of God has to be seen as a positive energy. Nevertheless, this will not work for atheists, even though atheists, also, can benefit from meditation.
As a neophyte, trying any of these chanting methods left me feeling silly and frustrated. Now that I have had success, I understand how this method works (see below), and could get it to work for me now.
3.) Sitting and focusing on my breathing. This was another method which did not work for me in the past. Yet, this is the method with which I had my breakthrough, and the method I would recommend to others now.
The reasons it did not work for me before is that I just felt silly sitting and focusing on my breathing, as well as that it was just so BORING!! I couldn’t focus on that for more than about five seconds without finding myself thinking about something else, or ruminating on my problems if I was in a time of stress. This was not useful at ALL.
4) Lying down to meditate. I kept falling asleep.
5.) Moving meditation. I did not attempt this in the past, but can see it would not have worked at all because I did not yet know what state I was aiming for. It will work once you have had success with sitting meditation.
What WORKED for Me, and What WILL WORK for You
Sitting and focusing on my breathing (but in a NEW way). The most recent book I read on meditation, The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Zen Living, has turned out to be the most helpful of all, in that it gave a REALLY good description of what happens when most people try to meditate, as well as WHAT YOU SHOULD DO when those things happen.
If someone told you, “Empty your mind of all thoughts,” most people could only do that for about two seconds before thoughts would come in. The reason meditative practices have you focus on ONE THING (whether it is the breath, or a mantra) is that by focusing on that one thing GENTLY (not forcefully), you have a point to bring your mind back to each time it wanders.
So, focus on your breath, in and out. I recommend closing your eyes. Don’t worry about HOW you should be breathing. Breathe normally (if your nose is blocked, breathe through your mouth). Each time you find your mind wandering, or thinking about something else, just bring it back to watching your breath (mentally, if your eyes are closed).
Within ten seconds, you may start to feel very bored. Your mind does not like to stay still and concentrate on just one thing. Just keep bringing it back to your breath. If you find it very frustrating or difficult, just try to do one full minute and stop. Just keep practicing (in different sessions) until you can get to one full minute. Once you are able to do that, try to get to a minute-and-a-half, and then later on, to two full minutes. Then try for three minutes. For me, it took me 30 years to get to two minutes (because no one ever explained that it’s normal that the mind keeps wandering–this is called the “monkey mind”–and that you just have to bring it back). If I had known that I would have been able to persevere through the boredom.
For me, at somewhere between two and three minutes, I found my brain made the switch from it’s normal left-brained mode to the right-brain mode (some call this the switch into alpha waves). In previous years, I did not know that this was was what I was looking for, and I also did not know that it would happen relatively quickly, if I could just get to that point. See Part I of this series for a description of what this shift feels like.
From The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Zen Living, here is a description of “Breathing Through Boredom.”
As you relax and your thoughts begin to slow, YOU ARE GOING TO GET BORED. You start to itch. You start to squirm. Your mind starts to tell you that you must just get up and just DO something. I can’t stand it! I have to move! I can’t just sit here wasting my time! (This feeling of boredom will evaporate the minute your brain switches into the right-brain mode.)
Or if you are extremely stressed (loss of a job, or work-related problems; family or personal problems; getting divorced, or breaking up with a girlfriend or boyfriend), you may instead have thoughts like my reader friend shared at the top of this post–thoughts which are causing you to worry and panic. You mind attaches to these thoughts and runs away with them instead of being brought back to focus on on your breathing.
In other words, Your brain is having a tantrum when you get bored and frustrated with sitting. Your mind just wants to keep jumping and flitting from thought to thought, activity to activity. At this point, hold firm and stay consistent. Refuse to attach to your mental tantrum. It will stop. Simply be aware, “Now I’m having the feeling of boredom.” (use the bubble technique, described below).
The Bubble Technique
This technique REALLY worked for me, both during my normal day when I found myself overcome with anger, and during meditation when I found feelings getting in my way of concentrating on my breath.
If something is bothering you, either as you sit in meditation, or even in your daily life, The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Zen Living says:
Imagine your distraction is enclosed in a bubble. Give the feeling a name: anger at __________; stress about ____________; sadness because of ____________; physical pain in my ____________ (you fill in the blanks); OR, just plain anger, stress, sadness, loneliness, frustration, irritation, confusion. Watch it float around, imagine the feelings banking around inside it. Concentrate on your breath, and when the feeling seems to have played itself out, take a deep breath, and poof! Imagine blowing it away.
Other thoughts and feelings will surely come up. Imagine them in bubbles, too. Watch them and name them. See them for what they are: just thoughts, just feelings, not necessarily reality or anything that defines who you are. It doesn’t have to control you. Just sit and watch, and blow those bubbles away when you are done observing them.
My main problem was remembering (when I was upset) to use the technique. The first few times I had the intention to use it, I only thought about it hours later. Then one day, I became extremely angry, and remembered to try the technique. I was pleasantly surprised to find that within three minutes, my anger had totally dissipated! Now I don’t have any trouble remembering to use the technique.
Some Final Thoughts
Once you have had success switching into right-brain mode with meditation, it will no longer take two or three minutes to do it. Within three or four sessions, you should be able to switch into right-brain mode within 15-20 seconds. You can feel the switch take place over about five seconds.
Also, I am personally unable to do the walking mediation, which should be done in a certain way (because I am on crutches with a long-term condition). However, I do swim, and found after reading descriptions of the walking meditation, found I was able to adapt it to swimming, and move right into the right-brain mode while swimming laps.
I usually swim laps in the breast stroke slowly and gently, without putting my head into the water. I found that I was able to focus on the movement of my hands in front of me, in the same way I focused on breathing when sitting in a chair. I find that within 8-10 strokes, I’m able to move right into the right-brained mode. I now think many athletes are doing this unconsciously, such as when you hear them say, “I’m in the zone,” or “It’s a natural high.” That’s just what it feels like.
Once you are successful, don’t jump into meditating too long each day, or you will get burned out and stop. Start with five minutes in each session (up to twice a day, such as morning and evening) and add ONLY ONE MINUTE each day (use a timer, if you have one) . In about a month you will work up to two 15-minute sessions (if desired) or to a maximum of two 30-minute sessions (hard-core people). Even if you only do five minutes a day, and stay at that level, this IS ENOUGH to see positive benefits in your daily life.
Lastly, I now see that the purpose of meditation is to be able train the mind so that it does not run away with upsetting or disturbing thoughts, like rough waves on a pond. When these thoughts happen, and when we find ourselves in difficult situations feeling strong negative emotions, we can take control, shift EASILY and QUICKLY into right-brain mode (because we have practiced in advance), and calm the waters of our mind. We come the masters of our minds, rather than the slaves of our minds. Meditation is especially good for gaining control over obsessive thoughts.
I’d be interested to know if any of these practical suggestions help anyone else. Good luck, everyone!
–Lynne Diligent
Tags:are disturbing thoughts disrupting your meditation, becoming the masters of our minds instead of being slaves to our minds, breathing through the boredom in Zen, can you lie down to meditate, can you sit in a chair to meditate, chanting while meditating, controlling obsessive thoughts, empty your mind of all thoughts, how long does it take to switch from left to right brain and what does it feel like when the shift happens, how much time should you meditate each day, how to use the Bubble Technique of Meditation, is the lotus position really necessary, many styles of meditation work, Meditation, meditation focuses your mind on one thing, meditation rules are flexible so don't get hung up on them, negative thoughts invading my mind, om mane padme hume mantra, om mantra, practical help for meditation success, remembering to use the bubble technique of meditation, swimming meditation, Tai Chi, taming the monkey mind, techniques of meditation as tools, turning off the left brain and turning on the right brain, walking meditation, watching one's breath, why is meditation so boring, your brain has a tantrum when it is asked to be still, zazen, Zen
Posted in Afghanistan, Africa, Algeria, Argentina, Asia, Australia, Belize, Brazil, Britain, Burkina-Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Canada, Cayman Islands, Central African Republic, Chile, China, Colorado, Columbia, Congo, Costa Rica, Cuba, Eastern Philosophy, Ecuador, Egypt, England, Europe, Expat, France, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Holland, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Intercultural, International, International Business, International HR, International Jobs, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Japan, Japanese Culture, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Malaysia, Mali, Mauritania, Mexico, Middle East, Multicultural, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, North Africa, Norway, Pakistan, Palestine, Panama, Peru, Portugal, Roatan, Russia, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Scotland, Senegal, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Sweden, Syria, Tanzania, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Uncategorized, Venezuela, Wales, World Economic Conditions, Yemen, Zaire | 3 Comments »
June 14, 2012
(Google photo)
Some parents in our upper-middle-class Middle-Eastern school come in to see teachers and make demands such as, “I want my child moved up to the front row today, and I want him to stay right there for the entire school year!” When a teacher tries to explain that they have to consider and balance the needs of all the children in the classroom, these parents sometimes reply, “YOU don’t tell OUR children what to do; we tell YOU what to do, because WE pay your salary by bringing our children to your school!” How does a teacher even respond to a parent with ideas like this?
As a foreign teacher, each time I had a strange encounter like this with a haughty and disdainful parent, I wondered about this strange behavior toward teachers and administrative staff. Whenever one of these encounters took place, I would ask my Middle Eastern assistant why these parents would behave this way. I was always told, “They behave that way because they are rich.” It still wasn’t clear to me what being rich would have to do with rude and imperious behavior. So when I asked how the two things were linked, I always got the response, “They think they can behave that way because they have money.” This didn’t clarify matters, either. It was especially not clear since I knew plenty of other people who had even more money and did not behave in that sort of manner at all.
Typical “look” of the type of parent who “talks down” to teachers in the Middle East.
I understood my assistant’s words, but still did not understand the behavior, or what his words actually meant. Ten years later, I believe I now understand–it’s not really about money, but about status. In every country, many people try to follow and copy what they perceive the rich people doing.
Coco Chanel
For example, let us look briefly at the fashion of suntanning, in Europe and the United States. In the 1800s, women used to stay out of the sun and even carry a parasol to keep the sun from falling on their skin. Prior to 1900, those with tanned skin were presumed to be low-class common laborers. In the 1920s, this perception began to change.
Coco Chanel
When Coco Channel returned from the French Riviera with a suntan, having a suntan (particularly in winter) became associated with having the time and money to vacation in warm places. By the 1940s, sunbathing and suntans were popular everywhere.
In the Western United States in the 1960s and 1970s, students took great care while skiing to never use suntan cream (in order to purposely come back from skiing with a tan or a sunburn), and to leave the ski-lift tickets attached to one’s jacket all season. Both of these actions raised one’s status, showing that he or she was someone able to afford to go skiing (an expensive sport). From the 1960s onward (the age of jet travel) a suntan in winter demonstrated that one was part of the leisure class, able to afford to jet off to a warm destination in winter.
Other countries have other ways of indicating that one is a member of the wealthy, or leisure class. In some Middle Eastern countries (such as Syria, among others), there is a special system which confers the ultimate status. The most important people carry special cards in their wallets which place them above the powers of law enforcement officials. Only members of the most important families are able to obtain this card, and so, are free to act without any repercussions.
Joan Collins playing the haughty and domineering Alexis Carrington on Dynasty.
Therefore, some people in the Middle East (especially the newly rich) perceive that what it means to “act like an upper-class person” is to act very haughty and imperious, as though you can order other people around, and no one can say anything to do no matter how rudely you act, or what acts you commit. This is what I believe was happening in my school. My conclusion at present is that the parents who behaved in an imperious manner were mostly not well-educated or well-brought up, yet had the fortune through business or inheritance, to come into money. Buy behaving this way, they are essentially trying to announce to others, “Look! We are important people, and we are more important than you (the teachers and school employees)!” So this behavior, in their mind, is a way for them to gain status and prestige, as well as to flaunt it to others. As a foreign teacher, it seems to me to be greatly lowering their prestige, but people in my local country seem to understand that, “Since they are rich, they feel entitled to act that way.”
This system even affects the behavior of children in school. Children in our school are often rude to their teachers, and completely uncooperative with regard to class rules (continual talking while the teacher is teaching; not staying in their chairs; refusing to line up or walk quietly in a line; talking loudly, rather than whispering). Every new idea works for just a day or two, and then it’s right back to the old behavior.
After teaching in the Middle East for twenty years, I now believe that the reason children are uncooperative is because being cooperative shows that you and your family must have low status. High-status children behave as they wish, because to do so shows the other children that they come from an “important” family and are “above” having to follow the teacher’s rules.
–Lynne Diligent
Tags:Aisha Gaddafi, Alexis Carrington, are rich people in the Middle East above the law, Coco Chanel, Dynasty TV show, French Riviera, haughty and disdainful parents, history of the fashion of suntanning, how to get status, Joan Collins, Middle Eastern and North African children are uncooperative with teachers because that shows other students that they themselves come from a family with high status, Middle Eastern and North African children who follow rules and obey the teacher are demonstrating their family's low status, parental attitudes toward teachers, power politics in schools, ways of showing that one is of the leisure class, what confers status in the Middle East and North Africa, why do some parents behave rudely to teachers, why leaving ski lift tickets attached to your jacket confers status among high school students, Why Middle Eastern and North African school children don't follow rules at school or listen to their teachers
Posted in Afghanistan, Africa, African Culture, Algeria, Anglo-Saxon Countries, Arab Spring, Arab World, Argentina, Asia, Australia, Belize, Berbers, Brazil, Britain, Bullying, Burkina-Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Canada, Cayman Islands, Central African Republic, Chile, China, Columbia, Congo, Corruption, Costa Rica, Cuba, Cultural Misunderstandings, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Economics, Ecuador, Education, Egypt, Elementary Education, England, Ethiopia, Europe, Expat, Explaining Middle Eastern Culture to Americans, Explaining North African Culture to Americans, France, Francofile Countries, Francophone Countries, Frankophone Countries, French Culture, Germany, Global HR, Globalization, Greece, Guatemala, Holland, Honduras, Immigration, In-Group Cultures, India, Indonesia, Intercultural, International, International Business, International HR, International Jobs, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Japan, Japanese Culture, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Lifestyle, Living Abroad, Malaysia, Mali, Mauritania, Mexico, Middle East, Middle Eastern Culture, Multicultural, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, North Africa, North African Culture, Norway, Pakistan, Palestine, Panama, Parenting, Peru, Plants, Portugal, Roatan, Russia, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Scotland, Senegal, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Sweden, Syria, Tanzania, Teaching, Teaching Abroad, Teaching ESL, Travel, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Uncategorized, Venezuela, Wales, Women, Yemen, Zaire | 12 Comments »
February 26, 2012
Anti-Immigration Plot?
Among some in the educational establishment in Northwest Africa, the idea is spreading that the new skills-based educational pedagogy is actually an “anti-immigration” plot hatched by first-world countries to “keep third-world workers in their own countries.” I even heard of a college professor of education who is teaching this to prospective teachers, who are asked to implement the new pedagogy.
What is actually happening with the new pedagogy, however, is the result of the new global communication revolution of internet penetration into third-world countries.
World Internet Users, 2011
In the past, as explained in The Globalization Paradox (2011), the Industrial Revolution spread from England, to the European countries, and to some of the New World (North America, Australia, and New Zealand), but not much further. These parts of the world had two distinct advantages (which up-and-coming third-world countries are now trying to do something about): 1.) they had enough educated and skilled workers to run the new factories, and 2.) they had good institutions–well functioning legal systems, stable politics, restraints on expropriations by the state–to generate incentives for private investment and market expansion.
Other countries had to depend on “importing” skills and institutions, and they used intercontinental labor mobility to do so.
Imported labor building American railroads
This era is now coming to an end. Internet communication and improved transport of goods via supertankers enables companies to move operations elsewhere, because it is more cost-effective, rather than the more expensive alternative of importing labor. Therefore, any country who wants those jobs must prepare its labor force.
This revolution is NOT happening because of a first-world PLOT designed by governments. It is an unanticipated effect of internet communications. Many, many individual companies are making these decisions on their own. Many are now forced to in order to compete with those who have already done so.
Forward-thinking third-world governments are now realizing this, and are beginning to create the conditions which will enable some of their citizens to obtain jobs in the new world marketplace, or to become entrepreneurs and create their own businesses.
Education in Libya, North Africa
For example, in North Africa, in just one decade, schools have been built all over the country, and for the first time, the majority of children are in school. Those who are graduating from college, having succeeded in their education, are now clamoring for jobs.
The only middle school in this rural area of Northwest Africa
Two problems exist. First, the countries are small, and the market size served by businesses is small (except in textiles, tourism, and agriculture). Therefore, the profitability of acquiring new equipment and technologies is small for the average business, which still remains family-based, and therefore provides limited opportunities for employment to average workers without family connections.
Tunisian college students
Second, most local college graduates are not from the elite classes (the elite usually send their sons and daughters to foreign universities). Many of these graduates feel that the elites are in cahoots with the local governments, and that these elites block improvements in others’ economic positions that would threaten their own power. This is a great part of what the Arab Spring movement is about. The newly-educated middle classes want a democratic meritocracy, rather than an oligarchy of the elites.
By implementing the new skills-based pedagogy, they are actually attempting to insure that what is being taught has some usefulness in the real world, as well. However, it is not only in the third-world where these pedagogies are being implemented; they are now de rigueur in much of the first world, too.
This trend has now been taken to an extreme, however, as was illustrated to me recently by a friend in England, “I was amazed to see how rigidly it is implemented these days in my daughter’s school. When you go to parents’ evenings, the teachers actually do have enormous A3-size spreadsheets with hundreds of tiny squares on a grid. Teachers find the student’s name, and move along the row, saying things like, ‘Uses adjectives to express emotion in a third party – level 4A;’ or in history, ‘deducing a specific social condition from a contemporary artwork – level 5B.’ It is all incredibly mechanical, and if you ask how they are doing overall, there is no such thing.”
A Page from the British National Curriculum
What is happening in third-world North African education is now no different that what is happening in Europe. It is not a plot. However, this trend in Europe appears to have gone much too far, into uselessness!
Is it something new that first-world countries are against importation of unskilled labor? Yes, and no. First-world countries are mostly interested in protecting the middle-tier of jobs, rather than those at the very top or the very bottom. These are the jobs that every country wants to reserve for their own workers, and that they do not want immigrants filling. This is nothing new.
Middle-tier, white-collar desk jobs
No country minds importing workers at the very high skill end, where those skills don’t exist, and where they may benefit by learning those skills from the imported workers. Also, most countries continue to import workers for the very lowest level of jobs, such as migrant farm labor, or office cleaning at night.
What is new is that both Islamic terrorism has been increasing in Europe, and migrating groups have been attempting to impose ideological change on their host societies. This has definitely had a backlash effect on the general willingness to accept immigrants, both in Europe and in America, especially from Muslim countries.
This restriction on jobs is even true for me as a first-world immigrant to a third-world country, where I find most jobs are reserved for people who are citizens. As a non-citizen immigrant, I am only permitted to do for which it can be “proved” by the company I work for that a citizen cannot fill the position, or else I must be self-employed. I want to point out that third-world countries have equally strong anti-immigration policies as do first-world countries.
Northwest Africa has been implementing a new educational pedagogy the past few years, which requires teachers to mark each student on specific skills mastered (similar to my English friend’s experience, described above), as well as to use modern group activities and other interesting delivery methods.
Crowded classrooms in Northwest Africa
One of the reasons teachers have been striking for several years is that most teachers feel this is too difficult and requires too much work when each teacher has over 300 students each week ( compared with typical American teachers having up to 180 students per week). One middle school teacher I know says, “I teach 13 classes of 45 students each, with each class lasting once a week for two hours.” An incredible amount of material has to be covered. This teacher felt that if he had three classes of 15 students each, or even his own classroom (he has to move from room-to-room) he might be able to fully implement the new educational pedagogy.
Educational trends swing with the pendulum as much as other social trends do. We are still clearly in the upswing of this trend toward skill boxes. I predict that the current trend will continue for another twenty years before it is scrapped in Europe, and educational trends head in another direction.
–Lynne Diligent
Tags:anti-immigration plots against the third world, Arab Spring movement is about the newly educated middle classes wanting a democratic meritocracy and not an oligharchy of the elites, current education trends in Europe and North Africa, Dani Rodrik, effect of Islamic terrorism on immigration in Europe, effect of the push for Muslim values on immigration in Europe, forward-thinking third-world governments, increase or decrease in importation of skilled labor into Europe and America, increase or decrease in importation of unskilled labor into Europe and America, is the first world trying to keep third-world workers in their own countires, local North African college graduates are from the middle classes, most businesses in North Africa remain family-based, new schools built in North Africa, new skills-based pedagogy in North African countries, skills-based pedagogy in England and Britain, swing of the pendulum in educational styles, teachers using A3 spreadsheets with checklists of specific skillls for each student, The Globalization Paradox, the new Pedagogy of Integration in North Africa, why teachers have been striking in Morocco and North Africa, world internet users in 2011
Posted in Afghanistan, Africa, African Culture, Algeria, American Culture, American Life, Anglo-Saxon Countries, Arab Spring, Arab World, Argentina, Asia, Australia, Belize, Brazil, Britain, Burkina-Faso, Business, Business Books, Canada, Cayman Islands, Children, Chile, China, Columbia, Corruption, Costa Rica, Cuba, Cultural Misunderstandings, Economics, Ecuador, Education, Egypt, Elementary Education, England, ESL, Ethiopia, Europe, Expat, Explaining American Culture to Foreigners, Explaining North African Culture to Americans, France, French Culture, Germany, Global HR, Globalization, Greece, Guatemala, Holland, Honduras, Immigration, In-Group Cultures, India, Indonesia, International Business, International HR, International Jobs, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Learning English, Lebanon, Libya, Living Abroad, Malaysia, Mali, Mauritania, Mexico, Middle East, Middle Eastern Culture, Multicultural, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, North Africa, North African Culture, Norway, Pakistan, Palestine, Panama, Parenting, Peru, Portugal, Relationships, Roatan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Scotland, Senegal, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Sweden, Syria, Teaching, Teaching Abroad, Teaching ESL, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Uncategorized, Venezuela, Wales, World Economic Conditions, Yemen | 8 Comments »
February 4, 2012
Europeans criticize Americans for working too much....
Where do the different work attitudes in different countries come from?
Americans are criticized by Europeans for “working too hard,” and “not having any culture.” Americans in Europe often criticize Europeans for having anti-business attitudes and being cultural snobs. The Asians, on the other hand, make Americans look extremely lazy! In French-speaking North Africa, we have a curious mixture of pro- and anti-business sentiments. Business and money are extremely respected, yet nothing works well. Businesses are extremely inefficient, and services are terrible (including government services).
There are now a number of good books written on differing work attitudes in various countries. Three of my favorites are The Seven Cultures of Capitalism, Working for the Japanese: Inside Mazda’s American Auto Plant, and Au Contraire! Figuring Out the French. But these books don’t explain where these attitudes originated from.
The answers are to be found in the historical experiences of various countries. The major difference which sets America apart from Europe, in work attitudes today, is that America has no history of feudalism.
European work attitudes, with their emphasis on free time for workers and quality of life came directly out of peasant attitudes and revolts against feudalsim. Peasants were the lowest class of society, were highly oppressed, heavily taxed, and were at the mercy of justice systems operated by the social classes who took advantage of them. When we study Feudalism as a system, we do not normally address how the peasants felt about it. In fact, peasants did not passively accept the situation, century-after-century. Peasant uprisings and revolts were a common occurrence. Later, as Feudalism’s authority began to weaken, the new urban workers widened the base of the lower class, against the princes and the lords. The upper classes used nepotistic practices to maintain their control over the bureaucracy.
The remnants of these attitudes are found today in European attitudes toward work, where laws and the public demand that workers have plenty of free time and are not “taken advantage of” by those in management (the old lords and princes).
Promotions into management are not awarded to competent workers; rather only people who are from certain families, or who went to the top categories of schools are permitted into the management tracks. Decision-making in French corporations follows a strict hierarchy, and authority belongs to the office a person holds, rather than to the individual. French managers tend to make the decisions and collaborative teamwork is discouraged. Co-workers tend to feel in competition with each other.
New York offices of the French Investment banking company, Calyon.
American work attitudes, in contrast, were not not born out of feudalism, but out of freedom, individualism, and capitalism. One of the main reasons Americans left Europe was because they rejected the class system. (This is why American bosses occasionally make the office coffee, to demonstrate to workers that they are not “above” others in social class.) In America, one’s social standing at birth does not prohibit one from rising to a prominent position (whether Abraham Lincoln or Barack Obama).
Who you were at birth has nothing to do with who you will be, or might be. In America, it is “up to you” to make what you will of your life. In America, no one cares who you ARE. They care what you have DONE, what you have ACCOMPLISHED. This is why Americans generally give the highest pay, promotions, and status in business to those who accomplish the most (rather than those who went to impressive schools, but who do not perform once employed). Anyone can reach the top tier by becoming rich, if they are smart enough, and willing to work hard enough. This is what every American teaches their children from the time they are two years old.
These attitudes are seen today in the American tradition of Management by Objectives, which involves participative goal setting, then choosing a course of action, and decision-making in line with those actions. Employees are measured against these standards. Unfortunately, American managers often find that management by objectives does not work well in many other parts of the world, such as in North Africa.
Satchel Paige - a victim of American racism in baseball
In America, the problem has been racism, not classism. The class-based problems and conflicts of Europe have been replaced in America by race-based problems. While minorities have now been absorbed into society through the past battles of Martin Luther King, past affirmative action (preferential hiring practices based on race), and by becoming members of the professional and middle classes, some disaffected groups and individuals are still very anti-white.
These individuals feel a group solidarity against the white culture. This same feeling also applies to certain religious groups and groups of new immigrants from various nations to America throughout our history. They were discriminated against on the basis of national origin until each group became well-integrated after two or three generations.
In the same way, many Europeans and North Africans feel a class-solidarity against those above or below them, which influences work behavior in those countries, in the same way that race conflicts affect work attitudes among anti-white groups in America. (The Arab Spring movement is partly about hope of the middle classes in the North African countries for abandoning nepotism and moving toward meritocracy.)
America continues to work on these race-based conflicts, but in reality, skin color and culture do continue to be a barrier to certain groups. White Americans, using the example of Abraham Lincoln, have always told their children since the age of two, “You could grow up to be president.” However, since the election of Barack Obama to the presidency, now for the first time, black Americans can also tell their children the same thing.
Barack Obama
Today in French-speaking North Africa, there are remnants of attitudes from both the feudal system and modern French systems. Work behavior of employees and managers here is extremely confusing for North Americans. While some people work hard and well, these people are rare, and should be especially appreciated (and rewarded).
Instead of being helpful to customers, and cooperative with employees or co-workers, most North-African employees (especially those not in management) tend to set up little “fiefdoms” and act like little Napoleons within their sphere of influence.
If someone comes to them with a request or a problem, instead of facilitating the process, they act as “gatekeepers” and often try to create problems and obstacles where none existed before. (Yes, some of them expect bribes, but even those who are not looking for bribes tend to behave this way.) Instead of sharing information so that the organization can function smoothly, both managers and employees are extremely secretive with information, insuring that the organization lurches along from crisis-to-crisis, and problem-to-problem. This seems similar to business practices in France, in some ways.
There seems to be a sort of “class war” going on between management and employees in most North African companies. Managers generally come from certain families, and have gone to certain schools. Employees, neither from important families nor important schools, have little stake in making the organization function well, and their main interest seems to be in working slowly and inefficiently, specifically making sure that no employer “takes advantage” of them by making them work “too hard.” Employees’ interests seem to usually be diametrically opposed to management’s interests, and many employees (not all) come into a job the very first day with the attitude that they expect an employer will try to exploit them.
Queuing at a government office in North Africa
When employees or co-workers are asked why they don’t give their best effort and take pride in their work, they often answer, “What will it get me if I do? I will not get paid any more.” Yet, most say, if presented in theory with a theoretical doubling or tripling of salary for a given job, that the work effort would be exactly the same, that this would not solve the problem. Therefore, the real problem lies in the attitude behind the work. Employees immediately assume that their personal interests are in opposition to their employer’s interest, and that they must do everything they can to “protect themselves” instead of everything they can to “do the job right.”
While most Americans view themselves as working hard for a chance to get ahead, and believe in more possibilities in their future, employees in class-based societies usually don’t believe they will be able to get ahead, or be rewarded for their efforts, no matter how hard they work. Their societies are not meritocracies, and this accounts for their reluctant attitudes at work.
Many employees in North Africa behave in a passive-aggressive manner at work, saying "yes," but secretly sabotaging their employers.
North African employees’ typical productivity is about one-quarter to one-third of an American worker (not everyone–there are some very hard-working North Africans; and certain regions have these problems more than other regions). Their jobs are “protected” by labor laws which prevent the employer from replacing them no matter how poorly they work. It can be done, but it is extremely expensive and indemnities increase for every year the employee was with the company. There are only three acceptable reasons to fire an employee: being caught stealing, showing up drunk, or not showing up at all repeatedly. Those reasons do NOT include being habitually late or doing poor work.
Looking at French-speaking North Africa as a whole, unfortunately, from the employee’s viewpoint, exploitation is rife throughout every level of the society. Few businesses are corporations. Most are individual or family-controlled enterprises, large and small. Nepotism is the order of the day, from finding a job, to being promoted, to getting anything done in the society.
Business owners tend to exploit anyone working for them who is not a family member, while non-productive family members often have a title and a salary, while doing little. People are less often employed for their skills than for who they are, or who they know. Of course, this makes services notoriously bad for consumers. But even those who lament the exploitation of workers in their own workplace often come home and exploit the labor of those below them.
One secretary, who previously in tears because her boss overworked her and treated her poorly, turned right around and did exactly the same thing to the assistant she later got. Some in the middle classes cry over being exploited at work and turn right around and exploit their own maids at home. As a teacher, I saw over-and-over young students complaining about adults and older children who spoke to them rudely, using insulting words. But the minute they become older themselves, they turn around and do the same thing.
All this exploitation is about power, which seems to be the main point of interest of each person in the society. Everyone wants to know precisely who has the authority for what, and authority is never delegated to others as it is in American culture. This also may be similar to France, but even more extreme in North Africa.
Every time a new employer-employee relationship is created (whether in an office, or a housewife at home with a maid), most employees are not thinking about if their new boss will be kind or provide them with reasonable working conditions. It is already assumed that they will not. Instead, they are thinking, “How powerful will I be able to be in this relationship?” (This may be starting to change with some of the younger generation who are becoming educated and, after the Arab Spring, are hoping for meritocratic changes to take place.)
This concern about power is where foreign managers and expats run into trouble. American managers aren’t generally thinking about using power and maintaining it. They are thinking about how to facilitate cooperation, collaboration, and effective problem-solving. Unfortunately, kindness and consideration (even in speech) is viewed as “weakness” in North Africa, and immediately, the subordinate maid or employee with the “power interest” mentality begins to take advantage, secretly sabotaging the goals of the manager. The most serious dilemma for the expat manager becomes how to treat employees well (a sincere desire), while at the same time getting them to put forth a good effort toward accomplishing the goals which are important to the manager or employer.
–Lynne Diligent
Tags:a chance to get ahead, Abraham Lincoln, Americans left Europe to get away from the class systems of Europe, Barack Obama, capitalism, causes of terrible customer service, class system prevents workers from ever getting ahead, corruption and bribery in North Africa, do-nothing government workers in every country, employees being secretive and controlling information causes a business to lurch from crisis to crisis, employees working slowly and inefficiently on purpose, employers taking advantage of employees, Europeans criticize Americans for working too hard and not having any culture, exploitation of employees in business, exploitation of maids, feudalism, freedom, French and North African workers who set up their own little fiefdoms and work and act like little Napoleons, government workers slacking off, how and why American work attitudes differ from European work attitudes, how managers use their power in business, kindness is equated with weakness in North Africa, management by objectives, MBO, meritocracy in America, meritocracy in North Africa, nepotism cartoons, North African labor laws, North Aricans respect power over kindness, now it's true that any American can grow up to be president, passive-aggressive employees who sabogtage their employers and cause problems in a business, power and authority in buisiness, problems employers face with workers in North Africa, problems foreign employers face when moving in to North Africa, race problems have replaced class problems in America, Satchel Paige, secretaries acting as gatekeepers in business, sharing information in business makes a business run smoothly, the dilemmas of expat managers in North Africa, the effects of feudalism upon the North African and European work ehics and work behavior, the Eiffel Tower, the Statue of Liberty, treating foreign employees well while at the same time getting them to work well, treatment of housemaids, why don't people in Europe and North Africa work well in management by objectives, why kindness is viewed as weakness in some societies
Posted in Afghanistan, Africa, African Culture, Algeria, American Culture, American Life, Anglo-Saxon Countries, Arab World, Argentina, Asia, Australia, Belize, Brazil, Britain, Bullying, Burkina-Faso, Business, Business Books, Canada, Cayman Islands, Chile, China, Colorado, Columbia, Corruption, Costa Rica, Cuba, Economics, Ecuador, Education, Egypt, Ethiopia, Europe, Expat Tax, Explaining American Culture to Foreigners, Explaining Middle Eastern Culture to Americans, Explaining North African Culture to Americans, France, Francophone Countries, French Culture, Germany, Global HR, Greece, Guatemala, Holland, Honduras, In-Group Cultures, India, Indonesia, Intercultural, International, International Business, International HR, International Jobs, Iran, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Lifestyle, Living Abroad, Malaysia, Mali, Mauritania, Men, Mexico, Middle East, Middle Eastern Culture, Multicultural, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, North Africa, North African Culture, Norway, Pakistan, Palestine, Panama, Peru, Portugal, Relationships, Roatan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Sweden, Syria, Teaching, Teaching Abroad, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Uncategorized, Venezuela, Women, World Economic Conditions, Yemen | 18 Comments »
January 28, 2012
The Seven Cultures of Capitalism compares the business cultures of the United States with Britain, Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands (Holland), France, and Japan. Other countries, such as Singapore, Italy, and Australia are sometimes mentioned. While not a new book, the content is still just the knowledge international businesspeople need today.
According to British author Charles Hampden-Turner and Dutch author Alfons Trompenaars, some of the biggest problems faced by Americans in International Business are:
1.) The United States invents extremely well (whose creativity correlates with an inner-directed society), but sometimes isn’t able to follow through well with the subsequent phase of innovation (improving and changing the product in order to to better serve customer’s ideas of how to use it, something at which the Japanese excel).
2.) American firms become extremely vulnerable at the point where they must serve a maturing market (just where Japanese industry strikes and makes massive inroads).
3.) Inner-directed Americans sometimes encounter problems in world marketing because customers using the products often do not share the logic of the designers.
4.) America’s inner-directedness prevents the U.S. from forming the cooperative structures necessary to compete internationally at the level of value-added chains, industries, or nations . (Three examples given of when America was able to close ranks to fight a larger problem were the Great Depression, World War II, and after the launch of Sputnik.) Other nations, especially Asian nations, are able to do this much more effectively.
Historically, large economic combinations have been viewed negatively in America’s experience. The Sherman Antitrust Act and other antitrust policies came about because America views collusion as the inevitable consequence of joining together. Turner and Trompenaars believe that Americans see cooperation between firms as collusion against consumers. and that their fears are not groundless.
–Lynne Diligent
Tags:Alfons Trompenaars, American business culture, Charles Hampden-Turner, doing business in Africa, doing business in Asia, doing business in Europe, doing business in Latin America, doing business in North America, doing business in South America, Japanese business culture, The Seven Cultures of Capitalism
Posted in Afghanistan, Africa, Algeria, American Culture, American Life, Anglo-Saxon Countries, Arab World, Argentina, Asia, Australia, Belize, Brazil, Britain, Burkina-Faso, Business, Business Books, Canada, Cayman Islands, Children, Chile, China, Colorado, Columbia, Corruption, Costa Rica, Cuba, Economics, Ecuador, Education, Egypt, Europe, Expat, Explaining American Culture to Foreigners, France, French Culture, Germany, Global HR, Greece, Guatemala, Holland, Honduras, India, Intercultural, International, International Business, International HR, International Jobs, Iran, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Japanese Culture, Jordan, Libya, Living Abroad, Malaysia, Mali, Mauritania, Middle East, Middle Eastern Culture, Multicultural, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, North Africa, North African Culture, Norway, Pakistan, Palestine, Panama, Peru, Portugal, Roatan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Sweden, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Uncategorized, Venezuela, World Economic Conditions, Yemen | 3 Comments »